Fouling effects on rejection in teh membrane filtration of natural waters 机翻标题: 暂无翻译,请尝试点击翻译按钮。

2000 / V.131 / N.1
UNESCO Centre for Membrane Science and Technology,Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry,university of new South Wales,Sydney NSW 2052,Australia;
Membrane processes in drinking water applications are micro- (MF), ultra- (UF) and nanofiltration (NF). These processes remove turbidity and bacteria (MF), viruses and macromolecules (UF) and small molecules and hardness (NF). Of particular concern in water treatment is the removal of natural organic matter (NOM) which contains potential disinfection by-product precursors. The presence of colloids, multivalent ions and organics in surface waters may cause substantial fouling of membranes. A study was carried out which looked at the rejection abilities ofa range ofmembranes targeting hematite colloids (40-500 nm), NOM and cations, fouling conditions and cost of treatment of these processes with consideration of chemical pretreatment with ferric chloride [ 1] .In this paper the effect of membrane fouling on rejection is presented. The study was based on experiments with two MF membranes (GVWP, GVHP, 0.22 !lm, Millipore), six UF membranes (1,3,5,10,30. 100 kDa, regenerated cellulose, Millipore),cand four organic NF membranes (TFC-SR, TFC-S, TFC-ULP, CA-UF, Fluid Systems, US). Three different types of organics (IHSS humic acid, IHSS fulvic acid and an Australian concentrated NOM) in a carbonate buffer containing calcium chloride and a background electrolyte were used. Experiments were carried out in perspex (MY, UF) and stainless steel (NF) stirred cells of a volume of 110-185 mL and a membrane area of 15.2-21.2xI0-4m2 at transmembrane pressures of 1,1-3, and 5 bar for MF, UF, and NF, respectively. UFremoves 10-95% of NOM depending on the molecular weight cut-off(MWCO) of the membrane. Pore sizes of <6 nm are required to remove about 80% of NOM, where a 6 nm pore size corresponds to a MWCO of about 10 kDa. Colloids are fully rejected. NF removes NOM effectively (70-95% as dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and 85- 98% as UV absorbance). Cation rejection is very membrane dependent and varies for the investigated membrane types between 13 and 96% for calcium and 10-87% for sodium. Fouling was also dependent on pore size and was caused by large colloids (250 nm) or coagulant flocs in MF, small colloids, organic-calcium flocs and aggregates with a dense structure (formed slowly) in UF, and by a calcium-organic precipitate in NF. The fouling influenced the rejection of colloids in MF and that of NOM in UF and NF. If a hiphlv If a hiphlv charged layer was deposited on the NF membranes, cation rejection was also influenced. The characterisation of permeate organics revealed that low molecular weight acids passed through the NF membranes and that the rejection of these acids was also dependent on the deposit on the membrane. The mechanisms which can explain such an increase in rejection are different for the three membrane processes. In MF , pore plugging and cake formation was found responsible for fouling. This reduces the pore size and increases rejection. In OF , internal pore adsorption of calcium-organic flocs reduces the internal pore diameter and subsequently increases rejection. In NF , the key factor appears to the charge of the deposit. This was investigated with the deposition of a ferric chloride precipitate. If the precipitate was of high positive charge, the rejection of cations increased and that of negatively charged low molecular weight acids decreased compared to more neutral or negative precipitates. In essence, the rejection characteristics of membranes depend more on the fouling state of the membranes and the nature of the foulants than on the initial membrane characteristics.
A.I.Schafer; UNESCO Centre for Membrane Science and Technology,Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry,university of new South Wales,Sydney NSW 2052,Australia; Desalination; V.131 N.1-3 2000; 215-224